Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II CSKP 2365/22 AI generated

Supreme Court refers bankruptcy appeal to Prosecutor General regarding creditor's claim validity and procedural standing.

Case Number II CSKP 2365/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland refused to examine the cassation appeal directly, instead referring the matter to the Prosecutor General for a written opinion. The appellant, a limited partnership, sought payment from a bank, while the bank argued the claim lacked legal basis. The court determined that the appeal required a formal assessment of the creditor's standing and the validity of the debt before judicial review could proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.: When a cassation appeal concerns the validity of a claim or the standing of a party, the Supreme Court may refer the case to the Prosecutor General for a written opinion instead of examining the appeal itself.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal bankruptcy proceedings creditor standing procedural validity Prosecutor General opinion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 2365/22 POSTANOWIENIE 14 grudnia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Jacek Widło na posiedzeniu niejawnym 14 grudnia 2023 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej B. spółki komandytowej w S.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawie‎z 26 maja 2021 r., VII AGa 654/20,‎w sprawie z powództwa B. spółki komandytowej w S.‎przeciwko Bankowi spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę, zwraca się do Prokuratora Generalnego o zajęcie na piśmie stanowiska co do skargi kasacyjnej wniesionej przez powoda. (A.G.) [ms]