Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CSKP 2350/22 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal on costs, ruling that lower court's fee assessment was legally correct and justified.

Case Number II CSKP 2350/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the assessment of litigation costs in a civil action between H. M. and J. M. against Bank spółka akcyjna. The appellants argued that the lower court's calculation of the 2,700 PLN fee was excessive, while the respondent maintained the amount was appropriate. The court upheld the original decision, finding no legal error in the cost assessment and rejecting the appeal on procedural grounds.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 370 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may dismiss an appeal if the lower court's decision on litigation costs is correct and no legal error is found in the assessment.

Keywords

AI generated
litigation costs appeal dismissal civil procedure fee assessment Supreme Court costs of proceedings legal error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 370 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 2350/22 POSTANOWIENIE 22 czerwca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Jacek Grela na posiedzeniu niejawnym 22 czerwca 2023 r. w Warszawie,‎w sprawie z powództwa H. M. i J. M.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o ustalenie i o zapłatę,‎na skutek wniosku pełnomocnika powodów z dnia 22 maja 2023 r.‎od postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego w Warszawie‎z 23 marca 2023 r., II CSKP 2350/22, zasądza od pozwanego na rzecz powodów 2700 ‎(dwa tysiące siedemset) złotych kosztów postępowania kasacyjnego.

UZASADNIENIE

[S.J.][ms]