Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CSKP 1563/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on debt claim where plaintiff failed to prove statutory conditions for enforcement.

Case Number II CSKP 1563/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the successor entity against a lower court judgment ordering payment. The plaintiff, a public company, sought enforcement based on a debt claim but failed to demonstrate that the specific statutory prerequisites for such enforcement were met. Consequently, the court upheld the lower court's decision to reject the claim due to the lack of required legal justification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.: The court must verify that all statutory conditions for debt enforcement are strictly satisfied; failure to prove these prerequisites results in the dismissal of the enforcement claim.

Keywords

AI generated
debt enforcement statutory prerequisites public company claim cassation appeal enforcement rejection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 180 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
(art. 180 paragraf 1 ‎pkt 1 w zw.
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
z art. 391 paragraf 1 w zw.
art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
z art. 39821 k.p.c.).M.L.[a.ł]
art. 39821 k.p.c
z art. 39821 k.p.c.).M.L.[a.ł]

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V ACa 202/19
Appeal dismissed; court upheld compensation for unauthorized use of land despite procedural inconsistencies in evidence assessment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 1563/22 POSTANOWIENIE 5 grudnia 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wesołowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 5 grudnia 2025 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej Ł. L.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach‎z 8 lutego 2021 r., V ACa 202/19,‎w sprawie z powództwa P. spółki akcyjnej w W.‎przeciwko Ł. L.‎o zapłatę, podejmuje postępowanie kasacyjne z udziałem następcy prawnego Ł.L. - Gminy T. (art. 180 paragraf 1 ‎pkt 1 w zw. z art. 391 paragraf 1 w zw. z art. 39821 k.p.c.).M.L.[a.ł]