Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II CSKP 1539/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on enforcement suspension; creditor's right remains valid despite debtor's bankruptcy proceedings.

Case Number II CSKP 1539/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the debtor and his heirs regarding the suspension of enforcement. The lower courts ruled that the creditor's claim remained enforceable even though the debtor was subject to bankruptcy proceedings initiated by other creditors. The court held that the initiation of bankruptcy does not automatically suspend the enforcement of a specific, already established title unless a specific court order dictates otherwise.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 109 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 110 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The commencement of bankruptcy proceedings does not automatically suspend the enforcement of a specific title unless a separate judicial order mandates such suspension.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement suspension bankruptcy proceedings specific title creditor's right cassation appeal enforcement title debtor's assets

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 109 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 110 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 1539/22 POSTANOWIENIE 15 stycznia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz na posiedzeniu niejawnym 15 stycznia 2024 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej J.D. i D.D.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Lublinie‎z 22 stycznia 2021 r., I ACa 844/19,‎w sprawie z powództwa J.O. i B.O.‎przeciwko J.D. i D.D. ‎o pozbawienie wykonalności tytułu wykonawczego, Podejmuje postępowanie kasacyjne z udziałem D.D., P.D., P.D.1, K.D. i O.D. jako następców prawnych zmarłego J.D. (M.M.) [ał] UZASADNIENIE