Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CSKP 1477/22 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects plaintiff's surname in civil judgment due to clerical error in lower court decision.

Case Number II CSKP 1477/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted the cassation appeal to correct the plaintiff's surname in the final judgment. The lower court had erroneously recorded the name as 'G.' instead of the correct 'G.' due to a clerical mistake. The court ruled that such errors must be rectified to ensure the judgment accurately reflects the parties involved.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may correct clerical errors in judgments to ensure the accurate identification of parties.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction surname identification cassation appeal judgment rectification party identification civil procedure Supreme Court power

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 1057/19
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's finding that defendants repaid loans based on witness testimony and lack of evidence for unreturned funds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 1477/22 POSTANOWIENIE 20 kwietnia 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Marcin Łochowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 20 kwietnia 2023 r. w Warszawie,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej A. G.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 7 stycznia 2020 r., I ACa 1057/19,‎w sprawie z powództwa A. G. ‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w Warszawie‎o zapłatę, prostuje w wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 5 kwietnia 2023 r. nazwisko powoda z „G.” na „G.”.[SOP][ł.n]