Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II CSKP 1366/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses bankruptcy claim against bank for lack of jurisdiction over debt collection.

Case Number II CSKP 1366/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the bankruptcy administrator's appeal regarding a debt collection claim filed by private individuals against a bank. The lower court found the claim admissible, but the Supreme Court ruled that the specific debt collection proceedings fell outside the bankruptcy administrator's authority to initiate. Consequently, the court held that the claim should have been directed to the proper debtor rather than the bankruptcy estate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 179 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 180 k.r.s.: The bankruptcy administrator lacks the authority to initiate debt collection proceedings against the debtor's assets; such claims must be directed to the specific debtor.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy administrator debt collection proceedings lack of jurisdiction bankruptcy estate civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 179 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 180 k.r.s.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 1366/22 POSTANOWIENIE 9 sierpnia 2024 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Zawistowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 9 sierpnia 2024 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej syndyka masy upadłości Bank spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Łodzi‎z 15 września 2020 r., I ACa 424/19,‎w sprawie z powództwa K. M. i I. M.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę, podejmuje postępowanie z udziałem syndyka masy upadłości Bank spółki akcyjnej w W. [SOP] [ms]