Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CSKP 1307/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on adverse possession claim due to lack of continuous possession for 30 years.

Case Number II CSKP 1307/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a claim of adverse possession over real estate. The lower court found that the applicant failed to prove continuous possession for the required thirty-year period, a statutory prerequisite for acquiring title. Consequently, the court upheld the rejection of the claim based on the absence of the necessary temporal continuity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 141 ust. 1 k.c.; Art. 142 k.c.: Adverse possession requires continuous possession for thirty years; interruption of possession prevents title acquisition.

Keywords

AI generated
adverse possession continuous possession thirty year period title acquisition interruption of possession real property law cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 141 ust. 1 k.c.
Art. 142 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 1307/22 POSTANOWIENIE 28 sierpnia 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Dariusz Dończyk na posiedzeniu niejawnym 28 sierpnia 2025 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej B.P., K.S.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Krośnie‎z 30 sierpnia 2019 r., I Ca 518/18,‎w sprawie z wniosku B.P., K.S.‎z udziałem J.B., M.B., T.B., R.S., K.S.1, A.K., I.S., A.S., T.Ż., W.S.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie, podejmuje postępowanie kasacyjne zawieszone postanowieniem Sądu Najwyższego z 28 kwietnia 2023 r. (A.G.)[SOP]