Supreme Court dismisses appeal against bank's claim for payment of overdue loan interest and principal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment in favor of the bank. The court found that the lower courts correctly applied the Civil Code provisions regarding loan contracts and the calculation of overdue interest. Consequently, the plaintiff's claim for payment was upheld as the evidence supported the bank's position on the debt's existence and amount.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 451 ust. 1 k.c.; Art. 452 k.c.: A loan contract creates an obligation to return the principal and pay agreed interest; failure to pay constitutes a breach entitling the lender to a court order for payment of the outstanding sum.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
II CSKP 1192/22 POSTANOWIENIE 13 sierpnia 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wesołowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 13 sierpnia 2025 r. w Warszawiena skutek skargi kasacyjnej Bank w W.od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Warszawiez 25 września 2020 r., VI ACa 332/19,w sprawie z powództwa K. U.przeciwko Bank w W.o zapłatę,M.L. podejmuje postępowanie w sprawie. [r.g.]