Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CSKP 1182/22 AI generated

Supreme Court excludes judge from hearing appeal due to conflict of interest involving the plaintiff's fund.

Case Number II CSKP 1182/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court excluded Judge X.Y. from adjudicating the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff's investment fund against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff's fund, which is the appellant, had a direct financial interest in the underlying dispute regarding the defendant, M.K. The court determined that the judge's potential conflict of interest necessitated recusal to ensure impartiality. Consequently, the appeal was not heard by the assigned judge, effectively dismissing the procedural step of that specific judge's participation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 228 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 229 § 1 k.p.c.: A judge must recuse themselves if they have a personal interest or relationship that could compromise impartiality, ensuring the integrity of judicial proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial recusal conflict of interest impartiality requirement cassation appeal investment fund plaintiff

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 228 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 229 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I ACa 446/19
Appeal dismissed; enforcement title invalidated as debt fully paid and claim unenforceable under Civil Procedure Code.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 1182/22 POSTANOWIENIE 6 czerwca 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Roman Trzaskowski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 6 czerwca 2023 r. w Warszawie,‎w sprawie z powództwa Niestandaryzowanego Sekurytyzacyjnego Funduszu Inwestycyjnego Zamkniętego z siedzibą w W.‎przeciwko M.K.‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek żądania sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y.‎wyłączenia od rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Szczecinie‎z 30 marca 2020 r., I ACa 446/19, wyłącza Sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y. od orzekania w sprawie.