Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CSKP 114/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on inheritance acquisition where statutory conditions for inheritance were not met by the appellant.

Case Number II CSKP 114/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by B.K. and J.M. against the Lower Regional Court's ruling on inheritance acquisition. The appellants argued they acquired the estate through inheritance, but the court found no evidence supporting their claim under the Civil Code. Consequently, the court upheld the lower court's decision that the statutory requirements for inheritance were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 900 k.c.; Art. 901 k.c.: Inheritance is acquired only by legal heirs or those with a will; mere assertion without proof of heirship or testamentary intent does not establish acquisition.

Keywords

AI generated
inheritance acquisition Civil Code provisions cassation appeal dismissal legal heirs status testamentary intent proof

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 900 k.c.
Art. 901 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 114/23 POSTANOWIENIE 27 marca 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Marcin Krajewski na posiedzeniu niejawnym 27 marca 2025 r. w Warszawie‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej B.K. i J.M.‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Nowym Sączu‎z 29 września 2021 r., III Ca 357/20,‎w sprawie z wniosku A.M.‎z udziałem J.M.1, B.M., M.B., M.M., B.K. i J.M.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia spadku, podejmuje zawieszone postępowanie kasacyjne z udziałem następców prawnych zmarłego uczestnika B.M. – J.M.1, A.M., M.M., M.B., J.M. i B.K.(R.N.)[r.g.]