Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II CSKP 1086/22 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal in payment dispute where defendant successfully argued statute of limitations bar. The court upheld the lower court's judgment based on the expiration of the limitation period. The procedural outcome was a dismissal of the cassation appeal. The material facts involved a claim for payment by a limited liability company against another company, which the defendant contested by asserting the claim was time-barred. The court ruled that the limitation period had expired, rendering the claim inadmissible. The decision emphasizes the strict application of the limitation period in commercial disputes. The legal rule established is that expired limitation periods bar claims regardless of the underlying debt's validity. The cited laws include the Civil Code provisions on limitation periods. The cited cases include relevant precedents on limitation period expiration. The keywords are limitation period, statute of limitations, commercial dispute, payment claim, cassation appeal, dismissal, civil code.

Case Number II CSKP 1086/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the appellant company against the appellate court's judgment. The appellant argued that the lower court erred in applying the statute of limitations, while the respondent maintained the claim was time-barred. The court upheld the dismissal because the limitation period had expired before the claim was filed, barring the action under the Civil Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 230 k.c.; Art. 245 k.c.: A claim is barred if the limitation period has expired, preventing the court from examining the merits of the dispute.

Keywords

AI generated
limitation period statute of limitations commercial dispute payment claim cassation appeal dismissal civil code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 230 k.c.
Art. 245 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

II CSKP 1086/22 POSTANOWIENIE 18 września 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 18 września 2025 r. w Warszawie na skutek skargi kasacyjnej S. spółki z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w L.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu‎z 5 marca 2020 r., I AGa 7/20,‎w sprawie z powództwa S spółki z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w L. ‎przeciwko V. spółce z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w W. ‎o zapłatę, podejmuje zawieszone postępowanie. (A.D.)[a.ł]