Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 450/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve procedural issues efficiently.

Case Number I NSWR 450/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of two separate protest cases regarding the validity of the October 15, 2023, national referendum. The petitioner, J. S., challenged the referendum's validity, while the opposing party argued for procedural efficiency. The court decided to merge the cases to facilitate a unified resolution of the legal questions raised by the protests.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The Supreme Court may join related cases for joint adjudication to ensure procedural economy and consistent application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
referendum validity protest procedure case joinder Supreme Court procedural economy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 450/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 15 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Tomasz Demendecki w sprawie z protestu J. S. przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień ‎15 października 2023 r. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych 15 listopada 2023 r. postanawia: połączyć sprawę ze sprawą o sygnaturze akt I NSWR 141/23 celem łącznego rozpoznania i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygnaturą docelową.[SOP] [ał]