Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 2039/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve procedural issues.

Case Number I NSWR 2039/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of two separate protest cases regarding the validity of the October 15, 2023, national referendum. The petitioner, T.W., challenged the referendum's validity, while the other case involved a similar procedural dispute. The court decided to consolidate the proceedings to ensure a unified and efficient resolution of the shared legal questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 200 ust. 1 KPA; Art. 200 ust. 2 KPA: The Supreme Court may join separate cases for joint adjudication when they involve identical or closely related legal issues to ensure procedural economy and consistent application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
protest against referendum joint adjudication Supreme Court procedure referendum validity procedural economy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 200 ust. 1 KPA
Art. 200 ust. 2 KPA

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 2039/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Sadowski w sprawie z protestu T.W.‎przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień 15 października 2023 r.,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych w dniu 16 listopada 2023 r., postanawia: połączyć sprawę o sygn. akt I NSWR 2039/23 ze sprawą o sygn. akt I NSWR 290/23 celem łącznego rozpoznania i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygn. I NSWR 290/23.[as] UZASADNIENIE[ms]