Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 1934/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve procedural issues.

Case Number I NSWR 1934/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of two separate protest cases regarding the validity of a national referendum. The petitioner, M.K., challenged the referendum's validity, while the opposing party likely contested the procedural grounds for the protest. The court decided to merge the proceedings to ensure a unified and efficient resolution of the shared legal questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 200 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 200 § 2 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may join related cases for joint adjudication to ensure procedural economy and consistent application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
protest against referendum joint adjudication procedural economy Supreme Court jurisdiction referendum validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 200 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 200 § 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 1934/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 15 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Wiak w sprawie z protestu M.K.przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień‎15 października 2023 r. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych 15 listopada 2023 r., postanawia: połączyć sprawę o sygn. akt I NSWR 1934/23 ze sprawą ‎o sygn. akt I NSWR 178/23, celem łącznego rozpoznania ‎i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygn. akt I NSWR 178/23. [ms][ał]