Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 1895/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve procedural issues efficiently.

Case Number I NSWR 1895/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of two separate protest cases regarding the validity of the October 15, 2023, national referendum. The petitioner, K. R., challenged the referendum's validity, while the other case involved a similar procedural dispute. The court decided to merge the proceedings to ensure a unified and efficient resolution of the legal questions raised by both parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 19 ust. 1 k.p.k.; Art. 19 ust. 2 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may join separate cases involving identical or closely related legal issues to ensure procedural economy and consistent application of law.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural economy joining of cases Supreme Court jurisdiction referendum validity protest against referendum

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 19 ust. 1 k.p.k.
Art. 19 ust. 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 1895/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Adam Redzik w sprawie z protestu K. R. przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień 15 października 2023r. na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych 16 listopada 2023r. postanawia: połączyć sprawę ze sprawą o sygnaturze akt I NSWR 143/23 celem łącznego rozpoznania i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygnaturą docelową. [SOP] [ms]