Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 1635/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve constitutional challenges efficiently.

Case Number I NSWR 1635/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of two separate protest cases regarding the validity of the October 15, 2023, national referendum. The petitioner, W.W., challenged the referendum's constitutionality, while the other case involved similar procedural objections. The court decided to consolidate the proceedings to ensure a unified and efficient resolution of the identical legal issues raised by both parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: The Supreme Court may join separate cases involving identical legal questions for joint adjudication to ensure procedural efficiency and consistent application of the law.

Keywords

AI generated
protest against referendum joint adjudication Supreme Court procedure constitutional challenge procedural economy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 1635/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Tomasz Przesławski w sprawie z protestu W.W.przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień 15 października 2023 r. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych w dniu 22 listopada 2023 r., postanawia: połączyć niniejszą sprawę ze sprawą o sygn. akt I NSWR 16/23 w celu łącznego rozpoznania i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygn. akt I NSWR 16/23. [ms][ał]