Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 1396/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve procedural issues efficiently.

Case Number I NSWR 1396/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of the current protest case against the validity of the October 15, 2023, national referendum with case I NSWR 290/23. This procedural measure was taken to facilitate a unified examination of the legal challenges raised by the protesters. The court decided to consolidate the proceedings to ensure a coherent and efficient resolution of the shared legal questions regarding the referendum's validity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The Supreme Court may join separate cases involving the same legal issues for joint adjudication to ensure procedural efficiency and consistent application of the law.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural consolidation joint adjudication referendum validity Supreme Court protest case

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 1396/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Tomasz Przesławski w sprawie z protestu B. K.przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień 15 października 2023 r. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych w dniu 22 listopada 2023 r., postanawia: połączyć niniejszą sprawę ze sprawą o sygn. akt I NSWR 290/23 w celu łącznego rozpoznania i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygn. akt I NSWR 290/23. [ms][ał]