Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSWR 128/23 AI generated

Supreme Court joins two referendum protest cases for joint adjudication to resolve procedural issues efficiently.

Case Number I NSWR 128/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ordered the joining of the current protest case against the October 15, 2023 referendum with case I NSWR 16/23. The plaintiff, J.O., challenged the validity of the referendum, while the opposing party sought procedural efficiency through consolidation. The court decided to merge the files to allow for a unified resolution of the legal questions raised in both protests.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 169 ust. 1 k.p.k.; Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The Supreme Court may join separate cases for joint adjudication when they share common legal issues to ensure procedural economy and consistent rulings.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural economy joint adjudication referendum protest case consolidation Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 169 ust. 1 k.p.k.
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I NSWR 128/23 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Tomasz Przesławski w sprawie z protestu J.O.przeciwko ważności referendum ogólnokrajowego zarządzonego na dzień 15 października 2023 r. po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych w dniu 22 listopada 2023 r., postanawia: połączyć niniejszą sprawę ze sprawą o sygn. akt I NSWR 16/23 w celu łącznego rozpoznania i rozstrzygnięcia pod sygn. akt I NSWR 16/23. [ms][ał]