Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I NSNc 768/21 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses enforcement order against closed fund for unpaid debts due to statute of limitations. The court ruled the debt was time-barred and the fund was no longer liable. Consequently, the enforcement order was revoked and costs were shared. The decision clarifies that closed funds remain subject to limitation periods. This case establishes that closed funds cannot evade enforcement claims via insolvency. The ruling emphasizes strict adherence to limitation statutes in enforcement proceedings. Legal practitioners must verify fund status before initiating enforcement actions.

Case Number I NSNc 768/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland revoked the enforcement order issued against a closed non-standard securities investment fund for unpaid debts. The plaintiff argued the fund remained liable despite its closure, while the defendant contended the debt was time-barred under the Civil Code. The court held that the statute of limitations had expired, rendering the claim inadmissible and the fund no longer liable. As a result, the enforcement order was fully revoked and procedural costs were shared between the parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 115 k.c.; Art. 116 k.c.: A closed non-standard securities investment fund remains subject to the statute of limitations for enforcement claims; if the limitation period has expired, the creditor cannot obtain a judgment against the fund.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations closed investment fund enforcement order non-standard securities civil code provisions procedural costs revocation of order

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 115 k.c.
Art. 116 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt I NSNc 768/21 WYROKW IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 1 grudnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Tomasz Demendecki (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca)‎SSN Grzegorz Żmij‎Agata Pawlak (ławnik Sądu Najwyższego) w sprawie z powództwa Niestandaryzowanego Sekurytyzacyjnego Funduszu Inwestycyjnego Zamkniętego w W.‎przeciwko W. P.‎o zapłatę,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych w dniu 1 grudnia 2022 r.‎skargi nadzwyczajnej wniesionej przez Prokuratora Generalnego od nakazu zapłaty ‎w postępowaniu upominawczym Sądu Rejonowego w Mrągowie z 31 sierpnia ‎2010 r., sygn. I Nc 649/10, 1.uchyla zaskarżony nakaz zapłaty w całości i umarza postępowanie w sprawie; 2.znosi wzajemnie między stronami koszty postępowania skargowego przed Sądem Najwyższym.