Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 1988/25 AI generated

Supreme Court recuses a judge from a possession by prescription case due to a conflict of interest.

Case Number I CSK 1988/25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the request to proceed with the case, instead issuing a recusal order against Judge Marcin Trzebiatowski. The applicant, K.P., sought to establish property ownership through prescription, while the respondent, A.M., requested the judge's removal due to a potential conflict of interest. The court determined that the grounds for recusal were valid, necessitating the withdrawal of the judge from the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 237 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 237 § 2 k.p.k.: A judge must be recused if personal circumstances create a reasonable doubt about their impartiality in the case.

Keywords

AI generated
recusal of judge conflict of interest possession by prescription impartiality requirement Supreme Court procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 237 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 237 § 2 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 1988/25 POSTANOWIENIE 16 marca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska na posiedzeniu niejawnym 16 marca 2026 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z wniosku K.P.‎z udziałem A.M.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na skutek wniosku pełnomocnika wnioskodawcy o wyłączenie sędziego Sądu Najwyższego Marcina Trzebiatowskiego od rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej uczestniczki‎od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Rybniku‎z 20 listopada 2024 r., II Ca 396/23, wyłącza sędziego SN Marcina Trzebiatowskiego od rozpoznania sprawy. [dr][SOP]