Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I CSK 1181/23 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal and excludes judge from hearing case due to conflict of interest.

Case Number I CSK 1181/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal and excluded the assigned judge from further participation in the case. The plaintiff sought payment from the defendant bank, while the defendant requested the judge's recusal based on a potential conflict of interest. The court ruled that the judge must be removed to ensure impartiality, thereby terminating the judge's involvement in the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 231 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 383 k.p.c.: A judge must be recused if their personal interests or prior involvement in the case compromise their impartiality, ensuring the integrity of judicial proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial recusal conflict of interest impartiality requirement cassation appeal judge exclusion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 231 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 383 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
V ACa 325/21
Court dismissed consumer claims against bank for loan repayment, allowing bank's counterclaim for loan return via set-off.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I CSK 1181/23 POSTANOWIENIE 2 listopada 2023 r.Sąd Najwyższy w Izbie Cywilnej w składzie: SSN Tomasz Szanciło na posiedzeniu niejawnym 2 listopada 2023 r. w Warszawie‎w sprawie z powództwa D.K. i K.K.‎przeciwko Bank spółce akcyjnej w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na skutek żądania sędziego Sądu Najwyższego X.Y.‎wyłączenia od rozpoznania skargi kasacyjnej Bank spółki akcyjnej w W.‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach‎z 27 października 2022 r., V ACa 325/21, wyłącza SSN X.Y. od orzekania w niniejszej sprawie.

UZASADNIENIE

[P.L.][ms]