Student's energy allowance claim dismissed; categorical exclusion upheld as objectively justified by diverse living situations.

The court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the municipal rejection of her energy allowance application based on her status as a student. While the applicant argued for unequal treatment compared to non-students, the court found the categorical exclusion objectively justified due to the diverse living situations of students and the risk of overcompensation. Although the decision suffered from a minor motivation defect, the court ruled this did not cause the applicant harm and thus passed over the defect under administrative law.