Student's energy allowance appeal dismissed; categorical exclusion upheld as objectively justified by cost savings.

The court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the refusal of an energy allowance, upholding the municipality's categorical exclusion of students. The applicant argued this exclusion violated equality principles and lacked reasonable justification, while the municipality cited administrative cost savings and the availability of special assistance for those who need it. The court found the distinction objectively justified by statistical evidence showing lower energy cost increases for students and deemed the referral to special assistance sufficient to mitigate any disproportionate impact.