ECLI:NL:RBROT:2015:1711
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2015:1711
AI generated
Minority contract voided; repayment ordered with interest from demand date; collection costs rejected.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court declared the capital effect lease contract void due to the plaintiff's minority and lack of court authorization. While the plaintiff was awarded repayment of principal plus interest from the date of the demand letter, the claim for collection costs was rejected as insufficiently substantiated. Consequently, the defendant was ordered to pay the principal and interest but not the additional collection expenses.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArticles 3:304 BW; Article 6:205 BW: A contract entered into by a minor without court authorization is voidable; upon voidance, restitution is required, but statutory interest on restitution begins only upon the debtor's default following a formal demand.
Keywords
AI generated
minority contract voidance
restitution of payments
statutory interest accrual
collection costs rejection
court authorization requirement
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArticle 3:304 BW
Article 6:205 BW
artikel 1:88 BW
artikel 1:345 BW
artikel 1:347 BW
artikel 3:52 BW
artikel 1:347 lid 2 BW
artikel 3:53 lid 1 BW
artikel 6:203 BW
artikel 6:205 BW
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedECLI:NL:RBAMS:2013:6240
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2013:6240 Rechtbank Amsterdam , 04-09-2013 / DX EXPL 13-4
ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:8043
Minor's unauthorized lease contract voided; bank liable for damages and costs due to breach of duty of care.
ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2013:5008
ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2013:5008 Rechtbank Midden-Nederland , 16-10-2013 / 2027273
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2016:9360
ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2016:9360 Rechtbank Amsterdam , 22-12-2016 / CX EXPL 16-85
ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2016:3502
Court declares effect leases void, orders refund with interest, and awards legal fees to plaintiff.