Court reduces confiscation order due to severe delay in proceedings violating fair trial principles.

The court dismissed the prosecution's request for the full confiscation amount due to a severe procedural delay exceeding the reasonable time limit. While the prosecution argued the delay had no consequences other than a factual finding, the defense contended the lack of individualized justification rendered the proceedings unfair. The court ruled that the six-year and ten-month delay necessitated a 25% reduction in the confiscation order to compensate for the violation of fair trial rights.