Court partially allows criminal theft charges while dismissing civil restitution claims due to jurisdictional limits.

The court convicted the defendant of attempted burglary and theft, ordering restitution to one victim and detention for non-payment. While criminal liability was established based on evidence of forced entry and intent, the civil claim against another victim was declared inadmissible because it must be heard by a civil court. The court ruled that the criminal division lacks jurisdiction over the full civil compensation amount, limiting its power to the state's collection mechanism.