Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
C30626919 / SKC-0885-25 ECLI:LV:AT:2025:1125.C30626919.40.L AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility under Civil Procedure Law Art. 464(7) due to lack of grounds.

Case Number C30626919 / SKC-0885-25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Latvia (LV)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Latvia rejected the admissibility of a protest filed against a regional court's decision to deny procedural rights transfer. The appellant argued for rights transfer, but the court found no substantial basis to overturn the lower court's ruling. Consequently, the protest was dismissed under Article 464(7) of the Civil Procedure Law as it lacked merit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Civil Procedure Law Art. 464(7); A protest against a first-instance court's decision to deny procedural rights transfer is inadmissible if the grounds do not provide an obvious basis for revoking or amending the contested decision.

Keywords

AI generated
protest inadmissibility procedural rights transfer Civil Procedure Law first instance decision lack of merit grounds

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Civil Procedure Law Art. 464(7)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
ECLI:LV:AT:2025:1125.C30626919.40.L
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility under Civil Procedure Law Art. 464(7) due to lack of grounds.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ECLI:LV:AT:2025:1125.C30626919.40.L

Lieta Nr. C30626919; SKC-885/2025

Civillietu departaments

Latvijas Republikas Senāts

RĪCĪBAS SĒDES LĒMUMS

Rīgā 2025. gada 25. novembrī

Senatoru kolēģija šādā sastāvā: senatore referente Marika Senkāne, senatori Valerijs Maksimovs un Sanita Osipova

rīcības sēdē izskatīja/Persona A/ blakus sūdzību par Rīgas apgabaltiesas tiesneses 2024. gada 17. oktobra lēmumu.

Senatoru kolēģija

konstatēja

/Persona A/ iesniedza blakus sūdzību par Rīgas apgabaltiesas tiesneses 2024. gada 17. oktobra lēmumu, ar kuru atteikts izlemt jautājumu par puses procesuālo tiesību pārņemšanu.

Blakus sūdzībā norādītie argumenti un apsvērumi, kā atzīst senatoru kolēģija, nedod acīmredzamu pamatu uzskatīt, ka pārsūdzētais lēmums tiks pilnīgi vai kādā daļā atcelts vai grozīts.

Tādējādi, pamatojoties uz Civilprocesa likuma 464. panta septīto daļu, senatoru kolēģija nolēma

atteikt pieņemt /Persona A/ blakus sūdzību par Rīgas apgabaltiesas tiesneses 2024. gada 17. oktobra lēmumu.

Lēmums nav pārsūdzams.

Senatore M. Senkāne Senators V. Maksimovs Senatore S. Osipova