Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
A420230715 / SKA-0557-21 ECLI:LV:AT:2021:1210.A420230715.24.S AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal against regional court ruling denying medical risk fund compensation.

Case Number A420230715 / SKA-0557-21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Latvia (LV)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Latvia dismissed the appellant's cassation complaint against the Regional Administrative Court's decision. The appellant sought compensation from the Medical Risk Fund following a medical procedure, but the lower court rejected the claim. The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's ruling, finding no error in the application of administrative law principles regarding the fund's liability.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Administratīvā procesa likums 348. panta 1. punkts; 351. pants: The Supreme Court maintains that a cassation complaint must be rejected if the lower court correctly applied the law and facts without procedural errors.

Keywords

AI generated
medical risk fund administrative compensation cassation appeal regional administrative court Supreme Court of Latvia administrative procedure law liability assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Administratīvā procesa likums 348. panta 1. punkts
Administratīvā procesa likums 351. pants

Cited Case Law

AI generated
ECLI:LV:AT:2021:1210.A420230715.24.S
Latvian Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissible request regarding police inaction and criminal process initiation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ECLI:LV:AT:2021:1210.A420230715.24.S

Lieta Nr. A420230715, SKA-557/2021

Administratīvo lietu departaments

Latvijas Republikas Senāts

SPRIEDUMS

Rīgā 2021.gada 10.decembrī

Tiesa šādā sastāvā: senatores Ieva Višķere, Lauma Paegļkalna, Rudīte Vīduša

rakstveida procesā izskatīja administratīvo lietu, kas ierosināta, pamatojoties uz /pers. A/ pieteikumu par labvēlīga administratīvā akta izdošanu, ar

kuru tiktu izmaksāta atlīdzība no Ārstniecības riska fonda, un izdevumu par juridisko palīdzību atlīdzināšanu, sakarā ar /pers. A/ kasācijas sūdzību par

Administratīvās apgabaltiesas 2020.gada 12.jūnija spriedumu.

[..]

Rezolutīvā daļa

Pamatojoties uz Administratīvā procesa likuma 348.panta pirmās daļas 1.punktu un 351.pantu, Senāts

nosprieda

Atstāt negrozītu Administratīvās apgabaltiesas 2020.gada 12.jūnija spriedumu, bet /pers. A/ kasācijas sūdzību noraidīt.

Spriedums nav pārsūdzams.

I. Višķere L. Paegļkalna R. Vīduša