Cassation appeal dismissed for lack of new arguments; appellant merely repeated lower court claims without engaging with prior responses.

The Court of Cassation declared the cassation appeal inadmissible because the appellant merely repeated arguments already addressed in the appellate court without engaging with the specific responses provided. The lower court correctly found the appellant guilty of drug importation based on evidence including a fake delegation and prior criminal history, and imposed a sentence deemed proportionate under statutory criteria. Since the appeal offered no new grounds or distinct reasoning, the court ruled that the procedural requirements for admissibility were not met.