Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's decision on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents obtained during immigration detention were collected without proper judicial oversight, while the state contended the collection was routine administrative practice. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied the law by rejecting the evidence due to the lack of a specific judicial order authorizing its seizure.