Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal against an order declaring the evidence inadmissible in an immigration detention case. The applicant argued that documents seized without a warrant violated constitutional rights, while the lower court found the seizure lawful under specific administrative regulations. The court upheld the lower decision, ruling that the procedural requirements for evidence collection were met despite the applicant's claims.