Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence in an immigration detention case. The appellant argued that the exclusion violated rights to defense, while the lower court found procedural irregularities in how the evidence was presented. The court upheld the dismissal, ruling that the procedural flaws rendered the evidence inadmissible regardless of its potential relevance.