Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's decision on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents presented during the immigration detention review were obtained unlawfully and should be excluded. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the procedural requirements for evidence admission were met and the lower court acted correctly in admitting the contested materials.