Cassation Court dismisses appeals against confiscation orders as inadmissible due to generic grounds and lack of new evidence.

The Court of Cassation declared the appeals filed by the Spinelli family inadmissible, ordering them to pay court costs. The appellants challenged a property confiscation order based on generic procedural complaints and arguments regarding constitutional unconstitutionality that had already been thoroughly examined by the lower court. The court rejected these claims because they failed to present new evidence or address the specific factual findings regarding the illicit income and social danger established in the prior decision.