Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents presented during the immigration detention review were obtained unlawfully and should be excluded. The court rejected this claim, holding that the lower court correctly applied the procedural rules governing evidence in administrative detention cases.