Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's decision on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents presented during the immigration detention review were obtained without proper judicial oversight, while the opposing party maintained their procedural regularity. The court ruled that the lower court correctly identified the procedural flaws rendering the evidence inadmissible under the relevant immigration statutes.