Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's decision on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents were improperly excluded during the immigration detention review, while the opposing party maintained strict adherence to procedural timelines. The court ruled that the exclusion was justified because the evidence failed to meet the statutory requirements for relevance and timeliness in this specific context.