Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the appellant against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence. The appellant argued that the evidence was relevant and necessary for a fair trial, while the lower court ruled it inadmissible due to procedural violations. The court upheld the lower court's decision, emphasizing that procedural requirements must be strictly followed before evidence can be considered.