Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the appellant against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence. The appellant argued that the evidence was crucial for establishing the facts of the case, while the opposing party maintained strict adherence to procedural rules. The court ruled that the evidence was inadmissible because the necessary procedural steps to introduce it were not properly exhausted before the first instance.