Supreme Court annuls lower court ruling for insufficient evidence of unjust enrichment in criminal appeal.

The Supreme Court of Cassation annulled the contested judgment due to a lack of sufficient evidence proving the defendant's intent to obtain unjust profit. The lower court had convicted the accused based on the alleged removal of property used for services, but the appellate court found the prosecution's case insufficient under the accusatorial system. Consequently, the conviction was overturned because the statutory elements for unjust enrichment were not met by the presented facts.