Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in administrative proceedings due to procedural defects.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence in administrative proceedings. The appellant argued the exclusion violated their right to defense, while the lower court found the evidence inadmissible due to improper collection methods. The court upheld the lower ruling, emphasizing that procedural irregularities in evidence gathering justify its exclusion regardless of the evidence's potential relevance.