Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to lack of procedural grounds.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's decision on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents obtained during immigration detention were collected without proper judicial oversight, while the state contended the collection was routine administrative practice. The court ruled that the specific procedural defects alleged did not meet the threshold required to invalidate the evidence under the relevant immigration statutes.