Cassation court allows appeal on sentencing but dismisses claims regarding omitted reasoning on acquittal.

The court declared the appeal inadmissible regarding the claim of omitted reasoning on the acquittal charge but allowed it on sentencing issues. The appellant argued the appellate court failed to address his co-counsel's arguments on the calunnia charge and lacked motivation for accepting responsibility. The court ruled that the appellate judgment did examine the appeal grounds and provided sufficient reasoning on the calunnia, while finding the sentencing section flawed due to unaddressed recidivism and continuation claims.