Criminal appeal dismissed for generic grievances lacking argumentative comparison with conviction reasons.

The Court of Cassazione declared Mario Petessi's appeal against his conviction for voluntary injury and threats inadmissible. Petessi argued against the affirmation of responsibility, but the court found his grievances generic and devoid of any argumentative comparison with the reasons underlying the conviction. Consequently, the court rejected the request for a re-evaluation of evidence, ruling that the appeal was merely a prefiguration of an inadmissible alternative reading of the probative sources.