Ordinanza — n. 21357/2022 — snpen Generato dall'IA

Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible for challenging sentencing proportionality under Art. 448 c.p.p. limits.

Numero d'incarto Ordinanza — n. 21357/2022 — snpen

Autorità giudiziaria Corte di Cassazione

Giurisdizione

Italia (IT)

Data della decisione 2022-06-01

Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court declared the cassation appeal inadmissible de plano regarding the proportionality of the sentence. The appellant argued that the applied penalty was disproportionate, but the Court held that Art. 448, comma 2-bis of the Code of Criminal Procedure restricts appeals to specific statutory violations. Since the claim did not fit these exceptions and lacked a clear violation of the principle of proportionality as defined by precedent, the appeal was rejected.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 448, comma 2-bis c.p.p.; Art. 610, comma 5-bis c.p.p. The appeal against a sentencing decision is inadmissible if it merely contests the proportionality of the penalty without falling within the strictly enumerated grounds for admissibility.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

cassation appeal inadmissibility sentencing proportionality Art. 448 c.p.p. limits de plano rejection criminal procedure code controllo della commisurazione della pena motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali motivi di cassazione