Ordinanza — n. 20850/2022 — snpen
Generato dall'IA
Criminal appeal dismissed for lack of standing due to procedural timing violations under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the appellant filed the request personally after the new procedural rules took effect, violating specific standing requirements. The appellant argued for generic mitigating circumstances, but the court ruled that the timing of the filing rendered the appeal procedurally defective. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay court costs and a fine.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen.; Art. 613, comma 1, cod. proc. pen.: An appeal filed personally by the accused after the entry into force of new procedural rules is inadmissible due to lack of standing.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
lack of standing
procedural timing
criminal appeal
personal filing
Code of Criminal Procedure
inadmissible appeal
procedural defect
porto abusivo di armi
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 610, comma 5-bis, cod. proc. pen.
Art. 613, comma 1, cod. proc. pen.
Art. 616 cpp
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IACorte cost. 13 giugno 2000 n. 186
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAOrdinanza — n. 19225/2026 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for reiterating arguments and attacking general mitigating circumstances reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 41515/2021 — snpen
Corte di Cassazione, Ordinanza — n. 41515/2021 — snpen
Ordinanza — n. 10898/2022 — snpen
Corte di Cassazione, Ordinanza — n. 10898/2022 — snpen
Ordinanza — n. 14370/2022 — snpen
Corte di Cassazione, Ordinanza — n. 14370/2022 — snpen
Ordinanza — n. 20847/2022 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of standing under new procedural rules.