Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to specific, unfounded challenges regarding double jeopardy and procedural dates.

The Court of Cassation declared the cassation appeal inadmissible, ordering the appellant to pay court costs and a fine. The appellant challenged the lower court's rejection of a 'ne bis in idem' exception and alleged errors in the dates of the offenses. The court found these arguments specific and manifestly unfounded because the defense failed to explain the relevance of the cited prior proceedings or justify the date discrepancies.