Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 17275/2022 — snpen Generato dall'IA

Italian Court dismisses appeal regarding denial of general mitigating circumstances and expulsion order.

Numero d'incarto Ordinanza — n. 17275/2022 — snpen
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Italia (IT)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible, ordering the appellant to pay court costs and a fine. The appellant argued that the Court of Appeal failed to grant general mitigating circumstances and did not sufficiently justify the expulsion order under Article 86 of D.P.R. 309/90. The court ruled that the lower court adequately addressed these points by citing the gravity of the conduct and prior criminal record, which satisfies the requirement for a reasoned decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 363-bis c.p.p.; Art. 86 d.P.R. 309/90: An appeal challenging the denial of general mitigating circumstances or an expulsion order is inadmissible if the court of first instance has provided a sufficient reference to the decisive elements, such as the gravity of the conduct and prior criminal record.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
appeal inadmissibility general mitigating circumstances expulsion order Court of Cassazione reasoned decision requirement domanda d'asilo di cittadino etiope allontanamento malgrado rischio di persecuzione divieto di discriminazione fondata sulla cittadinanza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 363-bis c.p.p.
Art. 86 d.P.R. 309/90
Del pari, non è consentito dalla legge neppure il motivo sulla disposta espulsione ex art. 86 d.P.R. 309/90, avendo la Corte di appello puntualmente motivato le ragioni della decisione.
art. 86 d.P.R. 309/90
Del pari, non è consentito dalla legge neppure il motivo sulla disposta espulsione ex art. 86 d.P.R. 309/90, avendo la Corte di appello puntualmente motivato le ragioni della decisione.
Generato dall'IA
Ordinanza — n. 30497/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal denying generic mitigating circumstances due to lack of positive elements beyond confession.
Ordinanza — n. 11643/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeals for inadmissibility due to lack of legal grounds and failure to cite reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 13925/2024 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal against traffic conviction for alleged factual error regarding defendant's motive. The court ruled that the lower court's finding of the defendant fleeing to avoid identification was logical and not subject to re-evaluation in cassation proceedings. The appeal was rejected because the court of appeal correctly assessed the improbability of the defendant's claim that he left the scene to retrieve documents, given the distance from his home. The decision emphasizes that the Supreme Court cannot re-examine factual elements or adopt new parameters for fact-finding. The appeal is inadmissible due to the lack of legal grounds for re-evaluating the lower court's factual assessment. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense. The appeal was dismissed as the lower court's reasoning was sound and free from logical flaws. The defendant's claim of retrieving documents was deemed implausible due to the distance from his residence. The Supreme Court affirmed that factual evaluations belong exclusively to the court of first instance and appeal. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's decision was based on coherent and logical arguments. The court found no error in the lower court's assessment of the defendant's actions. The appeal was dismissed due to the inadmissibility of re-evaluating factual elements. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's reasoning was sound and free from logical flaws. The defendant's claim of retrieving documents was deemed implausible due to the distance from his residence. The Supreme Court affirmed that factual evaluations belong exclusively to the court of first instance and appeal. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's decision was based on coherent and logical arguments. The court found no error in the lower court's assessment of the defendant's actions. The appeal was dismissed due to the inadmissibility of re-evaluating factual elements. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's reasoning was sound and free from logical flaws. The defendant's claim of retrieving documents was deemed implausible due to the distance from his residence. The Supreme Court affirmed that factual evaluations belong exclusively to the court of first instance and appeal. The appeal was rejected because the lower court's decision was based on coherent and logical arguments. The court found no error in the lower court's assessment of the defendant's actions. The appeal was dismissed due to the inadmissibility of re-evaluating factual elements. The court upheld the conviction for the traffic offense.
Ordinanza — n. 40247/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal claiming lack of generic mitigating circumstances due to insufficient sentencing reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 12337/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal for lack of admissibility regarding omitted statutory grounds for acquittal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

seguente: ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da El Habbat Said nato in Marocco il 1/05/1994 avverso la sentenza del 23/03/2021 emessa dalla Corte d'appello di Firenze visti gli atti e la sentenza impugnata; esaminati i motivi del ricorso; dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal consigliere Maria Sabina Vigna Ritenuto che il motivo di ricorso, che contesta la violazione di legge e il vizio di motivazione in relazione alla mancata concessione delle circostanze attenuanti generiche non è consentito dalla legge in sede di legittimità, avendo la Corte di appello ampiamente motivato sul punto.

In particolare, secondo l'indirizzo consolidato della giurisprudenza, nel motivare il diniego del beneficio richiesto, è sufficiente un congruo riferimento, da parte del giudice di merito, agli elementi ritenuti decisivi o rilevanti, come avvenuto nella specie (gravità della condotta e precedenti penali). Del pari, non è consentito dalla legge neppure il motivo sulla disposta espulsione ex art. 86 d.P.R. 309/90, avendo la Corte di appello puntualmente motivato le ragioni della decisione. Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende, P. Q.

M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 28 gennaio 2022 Il Consigliere estensore Il Presidente Maria n. \4igna Anna CriSct)olo DEPOSITATA INCA ELLERIA