Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of specific critique on prior rejected evidence analysis.

The Court of Cassation declared the cassation appeal inadmissible, ordering the appellant to pay procedural costs and a fine. The appellant argued that the lower court violated procedural rules by failing to obtain a specific voice identification expert opinion. The court rejected this claim, noting that the first-instance judge had already thoroughly examined and dismissed the need for such an expert opinion based on existing police records and intercepted communications.