Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to sufficient first-instance reasoning on generic mitigating circumstances.

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal by Shimi Liman inadmissible, upholding the lower court's refusal to grant generic mitigating circumstances. The first instance court provided adequate reasoning by citing the appellant's numerous and alarming criminal precedents within the relevant two-year period. The Supreme Court ruled that the trial judge is not obligated to evaluate every single defensive argument, requiring only an indication of the most significant elements deemed obstacles to the benefit.